Nad vs marantz sound quality Jun 9, 2023 · When it comes to integrated amplifiers, NAD and Marantz are renowned brands that offer exceptional audio quality and features. May 31, 2021 · Denon vs Marantz vs Yamaha -Receiver for 13. to me. 0cm 2 / 329. Oct 30, 2024 · Sorry if these are really silly questions. Until someone does a legit double blind showing amps can sound different and be identified by the testers thats my story and Im sticking to it! • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. Mar 30, 2022 · I like the Nad sound as much as you do, I just don't know what to do, the 399 has given me too many problems (I don't even need the bluos module, it would be useless waste of money). NAD (New Audio Dimensions) showed up on the scene in the late 70's. They are both quality companies that make good gear but I don't think you'll find many people claiming that they sound similar. For me though, those Dalis sounded bad. Marantz model 40N likes it but I think that the power of only 70wat per channel is too little, consider that we come from much more powerful amplifiers. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at the sound quality, durability, price, and so on. Denon AVR-X8500H vs Marantz vs Yamaha Build quality. Could suggest something else if it is available. The DAC sound quality in the CXA81 is indeed good. The PM6004 gets such great reviews for its price class, I'd bet it sounds very close to the 8004. 2 Professional Surround Sound. Both are as good as my Nakamichi av-1 and sound better than my luxman r-113. Dec 16, 2024 · Summary: The Best Nad vs Marantz Amplifier. 2 with Emotiva and that had a very controlled punch, detail and amazing soundstage. Would it make any difference in final sound quality? Sellers are suggesting Cambridge audio. 009% vs 0. I would imagine you would get similar results with teh other huge AVR makers with razor thin margins. NAD HT receivers sound great but don’t have the best reliability. Sound quality is the same as you go up and down the line. NAD vs Marantz: A Dec 1, 2009 · I do know the Cambridge Audio outboard phono stage has been well-received by many- if you can swing it, go for the MM/MC for flexibility. Carver HR895/Sonysomething. Sep 21, 2015 · SO, if you are looking for a receiver between a Marantz and Cambridge Audio, try NAD. +1 NAD / -1 Arcam. Dec 12, 2024 · My audio journey started at Bay Bloor Radio; founded by the late-Sol Mandlsohn who influenced more Canadian audiophiles than any publication and who introduced me to high-end audio when I was only 10. It sound much different with ARC off, even though it’s only correcting lower frequencies. Mar 31, 2021 · I was planning to invest in a stereo amp after a lot a options I have now come down to Marantz PM8006 which has 70 watts output per channel and Nad C388 which has 150 watts output per channel. My old school Cerwin Vega VS-120's can blow the rood off my garage. In this article, we will compare two popular models from these brands: the NAD C316BEE V2 and the Marantz PM6007. Sep 10, 2024 · Neutral Sound Signature: While Marantz amplifiers prioritize warmth, NAD amplifiers strive for a more neutral and revealing sound, allowing the music to speak for itself without any embellishment. May 28, 2020 · Thanks Carl and TNMN for the replies, I think the lack of confirmation of DIRAC bass management on the NAD is going to push me towards the Arcam, I do also like the onscreen overlay of volume control, I thought that was a given at this sort of level, looks like an Arcam AVR30 is on the horizon then. Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 Mar 22, 2022 · The NAD phono stage and the Marantz are pretty much a tie. Nov 6, 2007 · 3. NAD provided a product that Oct 21, 2020 · However, after a month, I decided to return the C50 and consider the C40 instead. NAD C 399 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Model 40n is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. getting a good class a/b amplifier (marantz or otherwise) or one of the ganfet ones, will do better sound for sure, but versus nad, you may give up some features and conveniences Aug 27, 2004 · You won't notice much real world difference in the sound quality ability if at all between two similarly priced NAD and Marantz units. Here’s a comparison between two closely similar CD players from these brands. Jun 19, 2006 · 1. so far I have come down to 2: Marantz 7001 and Rotel 1057. The most critical aspect of any audio equipment is, of course, the sound quality. Jul 21, 2023 · Sound Quality: Both the Denon PMA-600NE and Marantz PM6007 deliver excellent sound quality, with subtle differences in sonic characteristics. Marantz also offers a 3 year warranty vs 2 on the NAD. Aug 7, 2020 · The maximum sound quality of Bluetooth is pretty much the lowest of all digital inputs. Sound Quality and Features. Which amplifier has the best sound quality, NAD or Marantz? Both NAD and Marantz amplifiers offer excellent sound quality. But finally it all boils down to personal listening preferences. Throughout our hands-on exploration of the Yamaha R-N2000A vs Marantz 40n, we’ve experienced the power and performance of these devices first-hand, gaining a wealth of insights about their capabilities and functionality. Its just not there. Apr 26, 2012 · I demoed the Nad and Marantz bigger brothers a few years back, the Nad C355 and Marantz PM7001 Ki with my speakers - AE Neo 3. Denon seems to be the better reviewed units. Things to go with Marantz PM8006 - More watts compared to Audiolab 6000A - Tone controls and can drive 2 different speakers - Tried and tested loved Marantz sound signature. I really liked this little marantz amp (both build and sound quality), but it did not go loud enough for my tastes. ) with Audyssey calibration vs. Jul 21, 2022 · Sound Quality. I think when manufacturers refer to "hybrid", they mean cheaper manufacturing but higher price. The Denon PMA-600NE offers smooth and detailed sound with advanced AL32 processing, while the Marantz PM6007 provides a transparent and refined sound with its current feedback topology and high-quality DAC. of the 3, which is the best one according to you all: - cambridge audio 540a v2 - nad 325 BEE - marantz pm 7001 May 27, 2009 · NAD T752/Marantzsomething. It all depends wich options you want in the end. Sound stage is open and comes to life. May 25, 2018 · Finally the Nad C338 interests me mostly for the same reasons as the Marantz plus its got built in wifi which while i don’t do a whole lot of now but i would if it was there plus i’d like to try out the class D of the NAD and quite a lot of reviews indicate its awesome. I owned two NAD HT receivers and they both failed within three months after the warranty expired. Jun 21, 2018 · I always like nad sound for price but wanted 200+ watts so bought 2x nad and bridged Power : Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video : Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77 Speakers : Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. Sep 1, 2022 · NAD C320BEE Tested at £220. Only thing you're paying for that you want would be better amplification/channel outs. 5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+ Nov 30, 2023 · Marantz vs Onkyo; Marantz vs Anthem; Marantz vs Denon; Marantz vs NAD; Pioneer vs Yamaha; Marantz Vs Yamaha. Aug 31, 2005 · A neophyte is deciding between Receivers and Speakers and needs some help. This article will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at sound quality, durability, price and so on. Sound 4; Features 4; Build 4; MORE: See all Apr 7, 2022 · 85" Sony / McIntosh D150 / McIntosh MCT 450 / Marantz 70s / Cambridge Audio CXNv2 / Music Hall Classic / (2) McIntosh MC275 / XBOX Series X / NHT T5 85" Sony / Cambridge Audio 851N / Cambridge Audio CXUHD / (2) Outlaw Audio 2220 / Outlaw Audio 7000x / Outlaw Audio ICBM-1 / (3) Dali M-375 / (6) Dali Surrounds / (2) REL T5 Sep 7, 2007 · I have been searching around and narrowed my search down to 3 products. They both have equal potential, and either can win on their best days, which is Mar 25, 2022 · If that's the case, you might want to consider not only sound quality but the ease of use of the streaming system they employ. Nov 22, 2018 · Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77 Speakers : Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10. Jan 26, 2021 · Board index » General Audio Discussion » Amplifiers/Preamplifiers. Nov 7, 2016 · I had to return a Marantz sr-7008, it was an open box deal that was defective unfortunately. Aug 1, 2007 · looking at getting a replacement for my aging Yamaha receiver. Jan 13, 2021 · The sound stage just comes to life even without an EQ or Sub. I'd go with the Marantz and DAC Magic. I've only heard the PM8004 though. Jan 28, 2025 · Rotel DT-6000 DAC/CD player ($2,299) The $2,299 USD Rotel DT-6000 DAC/CD player includes a PC-USB input supporting MQA and DSD audio playback and renders PCM 32-bit/384kHz music files through the coaxial and optical inputs supporting music streamers and media players with the included tray loading CD mechanism providing playback flexibility. Jan 15, 2009 · well there's warm . To negate the hardware, and go right to equating components through software just doesn't work. If I stream from Qobuz to a Mar 30, 2022 · I like the Nad sound as much as you do, I just don't know what to do, the 399 has given me too many problems (I don't even need the bluos module, it would be useless waste of money). I have a CR-401 cd receiver from Marantz (An A/B stereo amp), that performs very similar to the Fosi TB10D. Mar 23, 2024 · Don't know about the CR 611. Now also own an MRX 1140 and no issues there either. For now shortlisted Marantz CD6004 vs NAD C 546BEE. Remember CD players? Yep, many people still use them. Both brands offer excellent sound quality, build quality, and features. Things to go with Audiolab 6000a Feb 25, 2021 · I'm not commenting on sound quality, because that is subjective. When dealing with higher price points, Marantz shows up as a “warmer” sound. Warm and musical sound: Marantz integrated amplifiers are known for their warm and musical sound, which is ideal for listening to a wide range of genres, from classical to rock. That being said, I would expect that NAD would be a great match for Paradigm speakers and that Marantz would sound more analytical, though still very good. Aug 19, 2020 · In the C 538, NAD has produced a likeable all-round performer. I just don't understand how a 50 pound amp and a 25 pound amp cost the same, both factory made in the same country. 5 lac as I have been suggested to purchase a audiolab 6000n with the marantz as it does not have bluetooth connectivity. 4inch 2: takes less space in your room Jan 9, 2021 · If you like Denon/Marantz (sound united parent company). My last hi-fi was a PM6002 and a CD6002 going through B&W 685 speakers with Van Den Hul 'The Wave' interconnects and Chord Silver Screen Plus speaker cables, and the results were pretty much the same. Dec 10, 2024 · The world of audio amplification has two formidable contenders: Marantz and NAD. NAD amplifiers are known for their neutral and transparent sound, while Marantz amplifiers are known for their warmer and more musical sound. It sounds fantastic but not worth the aggravation. Not to mention that I think that the NAD stuff I had was as ugly as sin. This £220 budget amp was a descendant of the NAD 3020 from 1978, and a clear example of how to produce a perfect performance-per-pound product. existing users of c. My impression of how these processors sound without room correction (speaker distances set properly) is the Anthem sounds better than the Marantz out of the box, and ARC is a pleasure to run, and makes a noticeable improvement without a lot of work. g. 2-ch AV receiver. 3D sound, specifically DTSX not yet on the NAD. the speakers are B&W CM-6, CM-C, CM-2 based on the speaker being B&W I am leaning more towards the Rotel, but I know the Marantz can sound Sep 30, 2019 · Yes the Audio Control Maestro M9 is quite spectacular for movies and is no doubt superior sounding to both the McIntosh MX122 & the NAD M17 v2. Marantz. the precalibrated sound. Oct 20, 2020 · The strongest point of the NAD is that superb, balanced and nuanced sound quality that is improved further with help of the now user-friendly Dirac EQ system. Both Marantz and Yamaha have spent many decades in the production and development of receiver series. audiogon. ” (As I do not use headphones for serious listening, I did not evaluate Dec 10, 2015 · The Marantz seems to have slightly better bass authority, more punchy than the NAD but at the other end of the frequency scale the high treble seems to fall off a cliff. NAD T 758 V3i A/V Surround Sound Receiver. On top of that I also just purchased a used in mint condition NAD C272 150W amp. I have listened to the Marantz SR6001 and really love the sound from it both music and ht. • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. Since I am having BDP220 I am not sure whether I should go with CD player or a DAC :sad:. I'm admittedly not a good audio tweaker - I'd like to use some nice room correction and be done with it. B1+amp x vs BT-capable amp y) is likely to be trivial when saying which amp you prefer overall. This is a nice combo if you're into that sound. Aug 14, 2010 · In the latter past, NAD'S quality control bothered me somewhat. As far as differences in Marantz vs Denon, sound quality in like units you'll never hear a Dec 4, 2021 · I’m hoping to get that clarity with some life in my music when listening. However, when it comes to choosing between a Marantz vs NAD amplifier, the decision can be daunting. The main difference between the WIIM amp and the ZA3 is the ZA3 is a simpler device with less compromises to fit a lot in one box. If NAD says there amp is 50 wpc, and it delivers 100, and the Yamaha is rated at 100 wpc and delivers it as advertised for the same price as the NAD, which amp is better if both produce good SQ. Ignore him. NAD C 399 vs Marantz Model 40n Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . So, take your time, compare the different models, and make the decision that’s right for you. NAD uses BluOS (also found in Bluesound devices made by NAD's parent company) which I've found to be user friendly. The differences between AVR options is not the “A-Hah” moment in comparison to 2-channel audio options. Aug 25, 2018 · By the that time Marantz had been sold a few times, Superscope then Philips had purchased Marantz I believe. Marantz: Warm and Musical Sep 14, 2021 · Few AVRs available with HT Bypass within 80k are Audiolab 6000A & Marantz pm8006. Is this typical of the difference in sound signature between Jan 17, 2023 · The Bluetooth circuit (two-way apt-X HD) allows 24-bit streaming from mobile devices and a high-quality output to Bluetooth headphones; there’s also a built-in dedicated headphone amplifier that NAD claims will “drive demanding high-impedance studio monitor headphones. My NAD T752 crapped out on me about two week ago and I borrowed my parent's Marantz SR7000, both old receivers. Historically speaking the Marantz will be the more reliable unit. 4, NAD T163/T973 combo, Marantz SR8500 and Rotel RSX-1056. This is probably the closest you can achieve given that purchasing a Denon or Marantz is a mandatory precondition for consideration. NAD offers incredible bang for buck- top notch sound at very affordable pricing. Dec 20, 2024 · 5. Sound preference for music & movies would be 50:50. Sonically they are all the same. Arcam now moved onto IMAX enhanced whatever that is once source material arrives. SCORES. I'll be getting credit for the return so I'd like to keep my new purchase about the same amount, $700-$800 or so. Pioneer, Marantz, Sanusui, Kenwood? Not counting the NAD 7020. As stated numerous times on this and other forums, the NAD produced a warm sound on my NHT M5's mounted on subwoofer bases. The Marantz was a significant upgrade from the Denon in terms of both looks and sound quality. 08%: Less Harmonic Distortion: Total Analog Inputs: 5 vs 4: More options for connecting Analog sources: Base Surface Area: 1252. After listenting to them, I thought the NAD • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. Nov 19, 2020 · IMHO Marantz is overrated compared to its competition and more $$$$. The NAD 316BEE will be a • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. Both NAD & Marantz have honest power ratings. Comparing Marantz receiver vs Denon is like trying to put your bet on who will win between two potential UEFA clubs. So if its a NAD you hope to get a "good one", one that delivers the proper power and sound. Jan 17, 2007 · NAD is still special to this day with it's superior sound quality over the Marantz of today. I imagine both sound very nice. Anybody have any opnionsor first hand experience on what some of the best sounding receivers from the late 70s early 80s are. The NAD sound blows the Marantz SR7008 out of the water and that is just the entry level $399 T748V2 NAD receiver but again that's with my AMP Jul 21, 2023 · Sound Quality: Both the Denon PMA-600NE and Marantz PM6007 deliver excellent sound quality, with subtle differences in sonic characteristics. I confess I'm a total newbie to this. The NAD setup sounded clean, but not crisp May 28, 2024 · Yeah i want to know if the M1 sounds better then the NAD M10 V3. Saul Marantz has been long gone and after Sony Superscope bought the brand in the mid 60s quality suffered as did sound. Oct 30, 2024 · Denon vs Marantz Hi-Fi CD Players. Have not had any issues with it. In other words - Marantz is no better and no worse than its competition but more $$$. Dec 5, 2024 · Performance and Sound Quality. Youthman's video comparing a Marantz AVR and Pre/Pro 2. Marantz Sound Quality. 02%: Less Harmonic Distortion You won't notice much real world difference in the sound quality ability if at all between two similarly priced NAD and Marantz units. Both of them are costing me around 1. The sound quality is so damn nice specially the vocals. Nov 30, 2023 · Simply put, NAD sounds warmer. Dec 1, 2018 · But all external factors remaining same how does the Marantz SR 7011 compare with the NAD T758 only pertaining to sound quality ignoring all the unnecessary bells & whistles. May 28, 2024 · MODEL M1 Wireless Streaming Amplifier, just announced by Marantz. Jul 4, 2023 · When it comes to high-quality audio equipment, Yamaha and Marantz are two of the most renowned brands in the industry. IMHO, I feel the NAD sound resembles that of a TT (warm, mellow) and the Marantz sound resembles that of a CD (sizzling bright). Denon builds the world’s first 13. 2s. Both receivers sound superb and some of the best of my collection. Without knowing which 2 models you're looking at it's hard to compare. Dec 16, 2016 · Have a NAD 3140, never a problem. But if you're particularly keen on the NAD sound or aesthetic, or you spot the C 538 with a discount, it's definitely worth considering. The effect of this within our reference system was exceptionally good with a tightening of the sound stage and added focus to my MK MP300 LCRs and X12 Subs with a more cohesive crossover Apr 17, 2012 · If you liked the Marantz sound then definitely stick with them. Downside - fatigue can creep in for bad/bright recordings. Marantz SR6001, Nad T765 (is coming soon) and Cambridge Audio Azur 640r version 3 (is coming soon too). It doesn’t set new standards at the price, nor does it do enough to worry the class leader. On the Receiver side I'm considering the Integra 7. The sound from Sansui is clearer and the separation is very much better. A good NAD can reproduce a resounding large sound signature. I know on my system Cambridge and Marantz have a fairly different sound, Marantz more musical, Cambridge richer and smoother. It's probably because we hear all the raw signals without any processing is my guess. Features Feb 28, 2003 · Audio. Marantz uses a Heos system which is not as well regarded. That being said, the Cinema 40 is the higher end version of the cinema 50 with discrete vs parallel amping and higher build quality…so the Denon vs the cinema 50 has very little difference, but the cinema 40 is a whole different class. The reason why I spoke about quality control is some years back I had a 7220PE 20watt per ch. Marantz arguably has better reliability more relevant HT features dollar for dollar. Receivers, Amps, and Processors NAD sound vs Marantz sound for two channel music? Jump to Latest 2K views Nov 20, 2023 · Considering the chance, I would get the opportunity also to improve in audio quality for music reproduction (stereo configuration + sub) and looking to AVRs that have good AB class amplifier. 4. 3. I prefer the Marantz sound. Both very good but preferred the Marantz sound. They sound very good. Ultimately, the best NAD vs Marantz amplifier for you is the one that meets your needs and budget. pl advise if this is true. sound signature…. I can’t compare as I’ve not used/listened to the NAD, but I’m supremely happy with the power and sound quality of the Cambridge running it to Wharfedale Evo 4. Features, Reliablity, Build Quality: Marantz easily wins in first 2 categories and Marantz having ever so slightly better build quality. 5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+ Sep 6, 2022 · Hi i am looking for buying brand new amp, to drive my kef r3 speakers , i am currently in trilemma of these 3 items, Nad m10 v2 vs Marantz model 30 vs nad c399 which one is best. ,and dull n boring - which I would put both NAD and Marantz into. Feb 21, 2018 · Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77 Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10. I can hear the percussion of cymbals and hi-hats OK, but the initial percussive sound seems very muted and veiled without any splash or dynamics. Generally, Marantz audio equipment produce warmer sound than NAD. Marantz has audyssey XT 32 which is not as good as Dirac on the NAD for room correction as per user forums. Thanks Jun 12, 2010 · On the other side, the Marantz may sound a bit bright but with all the "detail" in your music. Sound: Even though NAD brags more about their Hifi heritgage, the Marantz sounded just as good in Hifi and better in HT for slightly less money. a. Best Buy's demo room I don't now how room treatments will impact the sound quality but the differences between Best Buy's demo room with separates and the room with AVR was quite stark. I was not impressed with the sound quality. Our primary goal is insightful discussion of home audio equipment, sources, music, and concepts. In fact, most Denon and Marantz CD players deliver higher-quality audio than modern streaming services. Look on www. 2 vs 1: More options for connecting Digital sources: Coaxial Digital Inputs: 2 vs 1: More options for connecting Digital sources: Max Bit Depth: 32-bit vs 24-bit: Play higher resolution range media: Max Sample Rate: 384kHz vs 192kHz: Play higher resolution media: Base Surface Area: 1705. Mar 10, 2024 · I'd suggest auditioning the 15. They had an overinflated Apr 19, 2017 · You will be pleased with sound quality of both receivers. Nov 30, 2023 · Marantz and Rotel are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. The 3140 replaced a Marantz 2230. 5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+ Subs : Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512 Nov 27, 2019 · Marantz PM8006; Cambridge Audio CXA81; NAD C368; Which one of these is warmest ? Are there any other, warmer options (without sacrificing sound quality too much and in the same price range) ? My source - Rega Planar 1, speakers - Monitor Audio Bronze 6. CD Player Comparison – Denon DCD-600NE vs Marantz CD5005 Feb 17, 2012 · I prefer the build quality of the Marantz over the NAD. Marantz Model M1 - 1000€ NAD M10 V3 - 2500€ They both have: 100W@8ohm, Sub crossover, HDMI EARC, streaming platform, Pure about sound the M1 has a better value because it is 1500€ cheaper. Although they’re generally more expensive than NAD, they deliver superb Hi-Fi sound output. I expect to split my usage 50-50 between audio and video. Aug 30, 2023 · Simple Question: Are any really better than the others - Marantz, Yamaha, Arcam, NAD, Rotel, et al in sound quality? They all seem to get 5 star (or close) Performance reviews in Sound and Vision. receiver. Also, Marantz receivers from the 1970s epitomize the pinnacle of the solid-state hi-fi era. I am biased toward NAD, but the Marantz amps are nice as well. Also, they feel a little brighter. Marantz 6005 compares to NAD 755. The 2230 couldn't touch the NAD sound wise. No issues with ARC Genesis. Advanced Features: NAD amplifiers often incorporate innovative features such as room correction, digital streaming capabilities, and advanced power Feb 17, 2018 · Receivers, Amps etc should be bought on features, build quality, ergonomics, power requirements etc. when compared to brands like nad. Right now the big names on class D amps seem to be NAD and Marantz. I am really confused 499USD vs 899USD: costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0. 2inch 2 vs 1763. NAD was a fixture at Bay Bloor Radio, and it was one of the first products that I ever experienced, along with Yamaha, Marantz, Carver, Celestion Marantz NR1510 – Slim 5. Any difference in sound between these three choices would be more of a personal preference than anything. . Marantz vs Denon. No one can say why NAD are dragging their heels - 9 months from release feels excessive. Listening to Black (2004 remix) through the Powernode revealed much more of Vedder's voice without the C 700 coloration. Nov 9, 2020 · Was listening between Denon x4700, Marantz 7015 and Yamaha at Best Buy. However, NAD has opted to keep costs down by using cheaper components- and in my experience, this has an effect on reliability. However, while Marantz concentrated on surround sound improvement, Yamaha evolved from a music-oriented company to a company that Sep 21, 2024 · Never owned Marantz but owned a couple Denon, a couple Onkyo and a couple Yamaha over the years. 6cm 2 / 273. The Marantz delivered more detailed sound, superior Atmos, and better two-channel music listening, even seeming to provide more power to my 11. I do enjoy a lot of music from the 8805 using Auro 3D though. Features Oct 21, 2020 · However, after a month, I decided to return the C50 and consider the C40 instead. When it comes to performance and sound quality, Marantz and NAD integrated amplifiers are both excellent choices. If you prioritize high power output, extensive connectivity options, and affordability, NAD is an excellent choice. Here are some candidates at the moment: - NAD C328 (used, 350 €) - Marantz PM6005 (used, 300 €) - Yamaha S-A301 (new, 400 €) - Older amp like Sony TA-F 530 ES (used, about 150-200 €) The system will be used Jan 8, 2023 · -Sound quality …. NAD made it three wins in a row with the C320BEE. Nov 23, 2011 · I don't have too many audio CD's hence I thought of buying a CD player with USB capability. Jul 28, 2021 · The Rotel CD11 Tribute has a lot of early failures and problems including the first one I got. I did however just pick up 2 of the fosi ZA3's connected to a wiim pro plus and its pretty impressive. Both Marantz and Denon have their unique strengths in this department. I just got the Denon avr-989 (same as 2809ci) and it sounds completely different (much fuller, warmer etc. of course the correct answer is to get a valve amp! Dec 16, 2022 · Having experienced the Marantz 2230 and having heard NAD gearin my . Musicality was of prime importance to me. See all our NAD reviews; 2003 Jul 14, 2013 · NAD - 515BEE or 516 BEE Marantz - CD5005 Cambridge audio - CD-10 or 351C Want to know any tips or brandwise pros / cons. Jan 6, 2006 · Extensively listened to Rotel (1068/1075), NAD (T163/973) and Arcam (AVP700/P1000) separates plus their equivalent 7 channel receivers eg NAD 773, AVR300 (plus the Marantz SR8500 for good measure). The NAD T 758 V3i is one of the most after-sought receivers for movie lovers looking to build a premium surround sound home theater setup. The NAD sound blows the Marantz SR7008 out of the water and that is just the entry level $399 T748V2 NAD receiver but again that's with my AMP Dec 2, 2007 · The sound at lower frequency is lacking of tightness and the high frequency tend to be harsh. You can expect the NAD to have more usuable power, which might be better for your needs, but probably at the expense of some bells and whistles. Ultimately, the best way to determine which sound quality you prefer is to Jan 11, 2024 · The choice between a NAD and a Marantz amplifier ultimately depends on your individual preferences and requirements. MORE: Marantz PM6006 review. It is not a CD player to go for if a sound quality is the ultimate Totally agree! my old NAD 314 is 35watts and blows away the WIIM amp for both sound quality and power. And while previous NAD AVRs featured a front-panel that could be best described as "minimalist," the T 778 takes this concept to the next level by providing just a single power on/off button and volume control knob. May 20, 2014 · According to Denon and Marantz representatives I spoke to the Denon sounds bright and Marantz sounds warm. By comparison, the Denon sounded much thinner. "Although lacking analog inputs, Chromecast Built-in, Apple AirPlay, and a headphone output, the SHD Power includes features not normally found in a budget integrated amplifier-DAC: Roon Ready network streaming capability, parametric equalization, Dirac Live room correction • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. 3inch 2 vs 2126. Ideal for modern streaming apps and services. May 11, 2018 · The sound had a "clear and dramatic" balance, with instruments and voices having a striking presence in the soundstage. Feb 22, 2009 · To me, it's just the characteristics of the Marantz sound. The AI surround technology is geared towards delivering the best-in-class surround sound and a more engaging listening experience. Lavardin IT (2000) Aug 9, 2023 · This one,120 w/ch, very good specs, streaming, Dirac DSP, subwoofer app, remote and good connectivity in one small box. Except the Carver/Sony comparison, the differences were always subtle, but noticeable, even to the ears of my various ex-girlfriends, who cared less about sonic quality than i, until they were forced to sit down and give an opinion. Today, I really don't think we will go far wrong the comparably priced amps from Marantz, Yamaha or NAD. We said the C320BEE was a “genuinely stunning amplifier for the money”. It uses copper plates to the heat syncs which help to dissipate heat. Normally, I'd overlook that for performance and sound quality, but NAD failed to deliver in those areas for me. Marantz seemed to sound between the two but more like the Denon. Jan 27, 2022 · This is also when I decided to set my Bluesound Powernode ($949) on top of the NAD C 700 and compare the sound quality of the two units. something more modern. I have also owned a Marantz AVR for years. Both brands have earned a reputation for delivering exceptional sound quality and reliability. Nov 19, 2023 · On the other hand, excellent sound quality vs only good sound quantity? In the same model/price range, author thinks the Marantz will always provide a better sound experience? Author talks about tweaking to get them to sound the same. … NAD C316BEE V2 vs Marantz Feb 25, 2009 · In my opinion NAD components has developed an undeserving reputation of great sound, yet they are no better than 1970's components from MARANTZ, PIONEER, SANSUI, KENWOOD, TECHNICS, JVC, FISHER, SONY, AKAI, or HITACHI. Both companies have a long history of producing high-quality audio equipment, and their integrated amplifiers offer a wide range of features and performance levels to suit different needs and budgets. Can anyone help me understand how a Wiim Ultra's quality is effected when I use either a Marantz PM6007 stereo amplifier or a Yamaha A-S501 stereo amplifier and on an older amplifier. 5inch 2: takes The Emotiva system sounded very neutral and more detailed than the Marantz with the Diamonds. Understanding the historical context and reputations of these brands is crucial in analyzing their contemporary products and deciding which one fits your audio needs and preferences. 1 channel output allows for loudspeaker and subwoofer connection • 100W per channel high power and crystal clarity • Switching, digital end-to-end amplifier topology • Enhanced Feb 27, 2010 · Good day All. Dec 23, 2006 · That's an important consideration, cause in my mind the NAD sound is a smoother, more musical sound while the Marantz seems to play better with the dynamics of a home theater. Any once compared the Marantz CD6004 vs NAD C 546BEE CD players? Dec 20, 2018 · -1 NAD / +1 Arcam. Currently my options are: - Anthem MRX740: I am sure there will be an improvement for audio quality but I am worried that Arc issue will be same as Nad Apr 20, 2010 · Also, a NAD CD player I had once bought sounded worse then the cheap Sony CD player I had, so I took it back to the store after a few days. 2 channel receiver with Marantz’s famous audiophile sound quality. Apr 2, 2024 · When it comes to choosing an integrated amplifier for your home audio system, two brands that consistently rank among the top contenders are Marantz and NAD. Jan 4, 2009 · I'm curious how big the differences are in sound quality these days since almost all receivers have an automatic calibration mode (audyssey, mcacc, ypao). Feb 18, 2022 · (1) Don’t forget that AVR multi-channel audio is a totally manufactured and artificial recorded audio performance that is a much less differentiation between the contenders than vanilla high-end based 2-channel audio . Of course, each brand has different devices at different price points, however We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. At the same time there are people who claim that this is a total nonsense and both sound the same and only the source will make them sound different. I have If not using lossless audio, hard disk, or blue-ray you will hear no difference at all. 4 Marantz AV10 in conjunction with the power amplification you already own (and which yields the sound quality you want from power amplification). As comparing to my old Sansui CD 711, it is noticeable different and not as clean and smooth in high frequency. As for zoom well almost never has anything good to say. 02%: Less Harmonic Distortion May 18, 2023 · I am sold on the idea that separates sound far and away better than a single AVR from two main sources: 1. NAD continued to use discrete components longer than the other established companies that had already switched to IC's (Integrated Circuits). It also has A and B speaker outputs and 2 optical/1 coax digital inputs plus USB. I think most BT receiving circuits and chips are generically implemented at the line-level, so the variable performance of BT (e. All times are UTC - 8 hours NAD 316BEE VS Marantz PM6007 or PM7000N. 8cm 2 / 194. 2 setup. May 27, 2020 · NAD takes a far more reserved design approach compared with the death-by-buttons confusion that the majority of modern AVR's present. Both amplifiers cater to audiophiles and music enthusiasts, but they have distinct characteristics and design philosophies. Of course, each brand has different devices at different price points. com and you will find many new and refurb units for sale by Spearit Sound for a great deal. Mar 10, 2013 · The Marantz units do have a phono section if that is a consideration for the future. 03% vs 0. One observation while going through specs: SN ratio for Marantz <110 and Cambridge Audio <95. i have heard that there are more quality issues with c. The Creek can sound bright with the wrong source, but the Rotels I've heard sound quite neutral and have superb build quality I used to sell them with B&W speakers if that helps. My main concern is sound quality for movies and music. Arcam had theirs out since Nov 2016, or +1 month to get some bugs sorted out. Feb 27, 2010 · People seem to be quite impressed with the sound of some of the large receivers from the good old days when they are hooked up to good cable and a good source. Sep 25, 2024 · This approach allows Denon to offer high-quality products at a lower price point than Marantz. Moved to an Anthem AVM 60 years ago and was blown away at the improvement in audio quality and channel separation. Considering the NAD 7155 is so highly regarded here I gotta say the Marantz is pretty darn good too. 2. Apr 20, 2022 · the nad m series have a wonderful slew of features and cool form factor but i have always found the sound, based on class d modules, just ok, and not great by any means. Have run wired usb directly and streamed WiFi. Sep 16, 2015 · What we want is value for the money. I also tried Elac debut 6. 0cm 2 / 264. Driving CV R-10s. AVS community and many forums hold onto this claim. I have it down to three units, NAD 758, Onkyo TX-RZ800 and Yamaha RX-V781. I was using a Marantz SM-17 sa with both preamps at different times. Holy mother of god!!! Now my system sounds even nicer! I played one of my favorite movies, The Fifth Element, and damn the sound output when hearing some of the sound effects is so crystal clear it is astounding. Many people also add that Marantz provides better sound accuracy and quality. If you value musicality, warm sound, and meticulous build quality, Marantz is a top contender. the thing i’m concerned with about the Nad are that in all the videos 1,499USD vs 2,499USD: costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) Watts into 8-ohms: 150 watts vs 70 watts: Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers: Watts into 4-ohms: 150 watts vs 100 watts: Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers: Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0. Dec 9, 2022 · Why pay for the gold plated connectors and HDAMs when there is no evidence it would do anything other than their phycological impacts, that tend to precondition the owners to think they heard better sound quality, when measurements likely would show the opposite based on the measured performance of the SR6014, SR7015 vs the AVR-X3700H. Apr 14, 2023 · Hello all, I am picking a budget-friendly amp and I would like to know your opinions. Also, Marantz delivers more accurate sound. I really liked it. I don't use any room correction software, and even if I did, I still wouldn't say that you can claim that an AVR's sound signature is reliant on some Jun 22, 2023 · Arcam and Marantz are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry that produce high-quality speakers, headphones, soundbars, subwoofers, amplifiers and receivers. Apr 7, 2025 · While NAD emphasizes affordability and functionality, Marantz focuses on premium sound quality and luxurious designs. However, my KEF LS50 meta's and KC62 sub need something better to sound Jul 20, 2008 · I have only owned separates in the past, meridian 502 had a sound that I really liked, and the Musical fidelity A308 Preamp sounded ok to me. Could shake the upstairs while in the basement, playing Pink Floyd DSOTM. Many add that Marantz provides better accuracy and sound quality. The main channels are B&W 802d3 towers with each one bi amped by a Rotel 200wx5 (so 2x200w to each speaker). Nov 30, 2023 · Denon and Nad are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Wireless Streaming Amplifier MODEL M1 • 2. There may have been amplifiers that sounded as good, but none had the mix of sound and features at such a competitive price. NAD C 338 – Compact yet powerful hybrid digital amplifier. It'd be interesting to see how the Maestro M9 would stack up against the Lyngdorf MP-50 & the McIntosh MX160 and other high end processors. Yamaha seemed to have more noticeable upper bass. Any info would be appreciated. However, NAD T747 is more comparable to Marantz 5005. 002 Marantz 2230 hands down!!!! The Marantz 2230 is rated at 30 watts rms/ channel the NAD 316BEE rate 40/channel not much difference The sound quality of the Marantz as well as construction heads and shoulders over the NAD you are looking at. On the downside, the sound output from Marantz feels less detailed than NAD. The receiver packs modern features, including room correction software (Dirac Live) and ultra-clean power, which helps deliver NAD’s signature audio quality. The Denon AVR-X8500H front side is made of aluminium. Treble, mid and bass was altogether more cohesion on the Marantz -imo Bass on the marantz, sounded fuller, more rounded and tight where it needed to be. bfrm whufdrq qckyz qfi fadbhxx nikub jefp tjdso ipr xbqbe